The A580 is priced at $165 at the lowest, with other options at $180. The A750 has been the card we’ve tended to recommend most out of Intel’s lineup. The A750 has its cheapest entry at $205, a Sparkle variant that we tested at $210, and plenty of others in the $220 range. The Intel Arc A770 16GB model, which is what we’re testing, is typically around $290 to $300. With some quick browsing, here’s the update on the relevant part of the market. What we’ve learned thus far is that drivers may be harder to make than hardware, in some ways, or at least from the perspective of the millions of combinations of software and hardware that drivers must address. Intel Arc is a rapidly changing beast, which means it needs more frequent revisits to ensure we’re all up to date on the status of the devices. The article will be a mix of benchmarks and some commentary in the conclusion. We’re testing with the latest 5252 drivers that are supposed to further bolster performance in several games, but this was preceded by the 5234 drivers that offered a huge list of Dx11 improvements and some Dx12 improvements. Today’s testing will be focused on overall driver updates and performance improvements for Intel Arc GPUs. It’s competing stronger, almost oddly, at the 7900 XT price class than at the $200-$300 mark, and that’s despite NVIDIA nearly abandoning it. We think AMD is the most threatened in the market right now. That’s dangerous for AMD and NVIDIA when they compete in a similar price class, because AMD and NVIDIA’s drivers are so impressively mature and established already that there’s little extra juice to squeeze out of driver updates. This huge list of patch notes we’re showing is just one of the two most recent drivers - and Intel has published similarly sized updates for over a year now. There aren’t any hardware changes here, so Intel’s newly established positioning has been gained purely from driver and software updates. Today, we’re revisiting Intel Arc again - now going on almost 2 years later - to see how it’s improved from driver updates alone. The launch of Arc was abysmal, though, and our immediate concerns were that Intel would kill the project before it could fix its drivers.īut our early conclusions were that, when it worked, the hardware was competitive - it’s just the “when it worked” part that made it impossible to recommend. This content has been adapted to written format for this article and is unchanged from the original publication. Today, Intel is threatening that position.Įditor's note: This was originally published on Februas a video. We compete on quality.”īut AMD does compete on price, and that’s been their strongest position against NVIDIA. NVIDIA doesn’t compete there, and that’s something an NVIDIA employee told us many years ago, “We don’t compete on price. Intel Arc is competing in the budget market right now. Intel won’t take market share from NVIDIA it’s going to take it from AMD.”Īnd he was absolutely right. He said, “Intel doesn’t have to be number one. When Intel Arc launched, we spoke with respected technical analyst David Kanter. Visit our Patreon page to contribute a few dollars toward this website's operation (or consider a direct donation or buying something from our GN Store!) Additionally, when you purchase through links to retailers on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |